動態(tài)信息

關注我們,了解更多動態(tài)信息

行有行規(guī),英飛凌欠奇夢達的42億美元會還嗎?

關鍵字:英飛凌  奇夢達  內存 

為了提升獲利以及減輕資本支出需求,英飛凌科技(Infineon Technologies)在2006年分割旗下內存業(yè)務成立奇夢達(Qimonda)公司;不料,這家公司旋即成了英飛凌揮之不去的夢靨。英飛凌科技在最近發(fā)布的一份新聞稿表示,奇夢達的破產管理人要求賠償33.5億歐元(42億美元)外加利息的高額費用,以解決該公司被指控不當利用旗下業(yè)務部門而導致至今懸而未決的訴訟。

 

奇夢達公司的破產管理人一開始要求英飛凌支付的費用是17.1億歐元。但英飛凌并未說明為什么至今這筆費用幾乎已增加了近一倍之多。

 

英飛凌正設法提升公司的整體營收成長。根據(jù)業(yè)界媒體報導,本月初,該公司CEO Peter Bauer對于2012年前景發(fā)表審慎持平的看法,他表示由于歐洲南部的需求疲軟扺銷了在亞洲穩(wěn)定成長的業(yè)績,使得整體訂單量已略微下降。

 

在此銷售疲軟的背景下,英飛凌科技堅定地回絕了奇夢達所提出的要求,該公司并不認同破產管理員所要求的金額及其提出這一要求的依據(jù)。

 

在響應這項要求的聲明中,英飛凌表示,管理人員聲稱“2006年春天,有關兩項非現(xiàn)金投資的內存業(yè)務對奇夢達所貢獻的產值,不但遠不及約值六億美元的新股價值,它事實上還是負的。”該公司并且已經(jīng)“仔細地檢視此一非現(xiàn)金投入的價值,將全力反擊奇夢達的索賠要求,并對此次訴訟結果深具信心”

當英飛凌決定分割其內存業(yè)務另成立奇夢達公司時,DRAM市場的價格已經(jīng)開始下跌了,只有少數(shù)幾家廠商還能獲利。為了持續(xù)在該領域具有競爭力所需付出的龐大資本開支拖累了英飛凌其它更有利潤的業(yè)務部門。在當時的情況下,分割出內存業(yè)務似乎是一個不錯的主意,有助于該公司資產及其它資源集中,并脫離內存業(yè)務領域。

 

在當時,奇夢達可說是市場上的第二大內存制造商,但后來卻無法維持這一地位,甚至慢慢地邁向破產與停業(yè)清盤。目前不利于英飛凌的法院裁決就是在“資產減損責任”方面。據(jù)報導,該公司在今年第一季末約有現(xiàn)金與短期投資共22億歐元,即使手上只有2.05億歐元的長期債務,該公司也必須大量借貸才可能負擔得起如此龐大的費用。

 

Will Infineon Be Forced to Pay Qimonda $4.2B?

Bolaji Ojo

 

The 2006 spinoff of Qimonda AG was meant to improve profitability and lessen capital expenditure requirements for Infineon Technologies AG (NYSE/Frankfurt: IFX) but is turning into a nightmare for the German company. In a press release today, Infineon said Qimonda's insolvency administrator wants it to pay ?.35 billion ($4.2 billion) plus interest to settle outstanding litigation resulting from its alleged failure to capitalize the former business unit properly.

The administrator initially asked Infineon to pay ?.71 billion. Infineon did not say why the amount has been nearly doubled.

Infineon is trying to boost revenue growth. Bloomberg reported this month that Peter Bauer, the newly appointed CEO, had given a cautious outlook for 2012 and said orders had fallen slightly, due to weak demand in southern Europe that countered modest improvement in Asia.

Against this backdrop of weakening sales, the Qimonda request is getting a spirited response from Infineon, which said it disagrees with the bankruptcy administrator both on the amount requested and the basis for the request.

In a response to the initial request, Infineon said the administrator had claimed that "the value of the memory business contributed to Qimonda AG as a non-cash contribution in connection with two capital increases in the spring of 2006 was not only not equivalent to the price of the new shares issued in return, namely Euro 600 million in total, but was actually negative." The company said it had "made a detailed examination of the value of the non-cash contribution, will continue to vigorously defend itself against the claims, and remains confident about the outcome of this lawsuit."

When Infineon decided to spin off its memory operation as Qimonda, pricing in the DRAM market was sinking, and few participants were turning a profit. The huge capital expenditure required to remain competitive in the sector was dragging down Infineon's more profitable business units. It seemed like a good idea at the time to spin off the operation, contribute assets and other resources, and get out of the memory business.

Qimonda was the second-largest memory maker in the market at the time of the spinoff, but it couldn't hold that position, and it slowly slid into liquidation. A court ruling against Infineon would be financially devastating for the company. It reported ?.2 billion in cash and short-term investments at the end of the first quarter, and even though it had only ?05 million of long-term debt (for a net cash position of approximately ? billion), it would still have to borrow heavily to foot a bill that large.

 

產品目錄
MULTICOMP PRO
Kyet 科雅薄膜電容器
喬光電子(FTR)
采樣電阻
KINGSTATE(志豐電子)
君耀電子(Brightking)
RUBYCON電容原裝現(xiàn)貨供應商
HAMAMATSU 濱松光電產品
傳感器
飛思卡爾開發(fā)工具 Freescale
嵌入式解決方案
自動化工業(yè)系統(tǒng)
網(wǎng)絡攝像機
行車記錄儀
地址(中國):杭州市拱墅區(qū)莫干山路972號北部軟件園泰嘉園B座303室
QQ:1261061025
郵箱:master@wfyear.com
電話:800-886-8870